![]() India needed just six wickets to win the game and quite expectedly, the mood in the set-up was upbeat. With Elgar getting hit, the umpires called it Tea, allowing the physiotherapist to have a look at the opener. All smiles on Virat Kohli and Rohit’s faces Dean Elgar, getting hit by a Umesh Yadav bumper, one that forced the visitors to opt for the concussion substitute in the form of Theunis De Bruyn, testified it to the hilt. The duo did not relent even after wrecking through South Africa’s top-order- Quinton de Kock, Faf du Plessis, Zubayr Hamza, Temba Bavuma. Like the first innings, Umesh Yadav and Mohammed Shami came up firing all cylinders. Hamza’s wicket led to another collapse and by the time the Tea break came rolling India needed just six wickets to wrap up the game on the third day itself. Hamza and Temba Bavuma had stitched a valiant partnership for the fourth wicket but the right-hander was undone by the accuracy of Ravindra Jadeja. They had been forced to follow-on for the second consecutive time despite a brilliant half-century from Zubayr Hamza. Their batsman had seen their stumps flying courtesy pace, accuracy, precision, and sustained hostility of the Indian fast bowlers, Umesh Yadav and Mohammed Shami. A few hours later, du Plessis was trapped by a Mohammad Shami inswinging delivery.īetween these two dismissals, South Africa had lost nine wickets. The right-hander had his stumps knocked over when he was undone by a Umesh Yadav outswinger. Having started the day at 9/2, South Africa had the worst possible start to the day when they lost skipper Faf du Plessis for 4. By the time the proceedings ended, the talks had shifted to whether the play could be extended for half-an-hour with India needing just two wickets to complete what has been a total annihilation of the South Africans. Leading into the third day, there were apprehensions as to whether the weather and bad light could play a decisive role in the outcome of the Test matches. They are considered safe because a modern high spec PC would still take an average of decades (if not centuries) to stumble across the correct key set.Īlthough it might get "lucky" and crack it in hours.The third day of the Ranchi Test was a microcosm of the gulf that is there currently between India and South Africa. These could also be broken by a sequential brute force attack. Only now it's done using large calculations (frequently based on very large prime numbers as keys). (Also remember, most "secure" websites such as banks encrypt the traffic to and from the sites using methods based on scrambling / shuffling / substituting characters just like the ancients did. Therefore "p4ssw0rd" would be faster to crack than - though easier to remember for the weak link in IT security. So an attack on a password would use a dictionary of common words, known passwords from previous bulk thefts of data, anything you already know about the target (spouses / kids birthdays) (if this is a very targeted attack. However, even with the speed of modern machines it is not really practical. As you suggest an attack that just sequentially worked it's way through every combination of letter (case), digit and symbol would crack any password.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |